Seattle Columnist Who Pissed Off Michael Bennett Admits He Got It Wrong. In the wake of Michael Bennetts threat to boycott his newspaper, Seattle Times columnist Matt Calkins has taken the L. Michael Bennett is mad at the Seattle Times. The Seahawks defensive lineman didnt take kindly to a. Calkins wrote that Bennett was immature in part because he had ripped into another reporter, Bill Wixey of Q1. Falcons in January. Bennett responded angrily to a question Wixey asked, and went so far as to ask what kind of adversity Wixey had endured. It turns out, though, that Bennett didprivately. An editors note was added to the top of Calkinss original column Monday night, and Calkins has also written a separate apology There will be no excuses here, no justifications, no attempts to explain it away. Degrassi Season 7 Episode 3 Project Free Tv here. I made a mistake this weekend. And I want to apologize. If he is serious about being a role model, I feel like it would have been in his best interest to show his contrition to the world. But its also possible that Wixey, who couldnt be reached for comment, asked Bennett to keep the apology between them so the story would die. I just dont know. What I do know is that I should have reached out to Wixey before posting my column. The fact that I didnt was just plain lazy. Watch Kept Woman Online Metacritic here. Watch Dangerous Calling Online more. The real lesson here is to not judge athletes based on their reactions to postgame locker room questions. The details are far from final, but no matter which way you slice it, at this point it seems clear that if the American Health Care Act passes, millions of Americans. These guys elite pitchers have not done it in one year. Ive been in enough locker rooms to know that athletes can be frustrated and irritable and, well, human after disappointing defeats. If the goal of locker room access and postgame interviews is to mine for quotes and color and to get a sense of what it really feels like to win or lose, a players profane surliness is generally just something that serves the story and gets readers closer to the truth. To use a single isolated incident to make a sweeping read about what kind of person someone is only serves to deepen the divide between reporters and the public they theoretically represent and the athletes they cover. Good on Calkins for eating shit and owning up to his mistake heres hoping other reporters see that and understand the true takeaway.